Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593182›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic stem cell transplantation].

Christoph Schmid, Hans-Jochem Kolb

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christoph SchmidProfessur für Stammzell-Transplantation und Zelltherapieforschung, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland. christoph.schmid@uk-augsburg.de.
Hans-Jochem KolbKolb Consulting UG, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transfusion of donor lymphocytes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (known as donor lymphocyte infusion, DLI) is the oldest form of cellular immunotherapy. The therapeutic effect is based on the polyclonal reaction of the transferred immune effector cells of the donor against the underlying malignant disease, the graft versus malignancy reaction (GvM). Based on findings from the canine model, DLI has been used for over 30 years, primarily for the prophylaxis and treatment of recurrence of hematological neoplasms after allogeneic transplantation, whereby the various diseases exhibit very different sensitivities to the GvM effect. As a result, both the indications and the potential combination of DLI with classical chemotherapy and newer drugs are different. The main complication of DLI is the induction of a graft versus host disease, the risk of which is influenced in particular by the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match between donor and recipient as well as the dosage and timing of DLI. Based on large registry data, recommendations for the implementation of DLI in the various constellations and indications have been developed in recent years, which have already proven to be easy to implement in practice. This article summarizes the basic principles, clinical use and recommendations for application.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLymphocyte TransfusionStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsDogsGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansTransplantation, HomologousCellular tumor therapyGraft vs. host diseaseGraft vs. malignancy effectNeoplasm recurrence/prophylaxisNeoplasm recurrence/treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.