ArticleCalcified tissue international2025
Feasibility of 100 kV Low-voltage Bone Mineral Density Measurement with Quantitative CT: Phantom and Clinical Research.
Article in Calcified tissue international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the feasibility and accuracy of 100 kV low-voltage quantitative CT (QCT) for bone mineral density (BMD) measurement using the European Spine Phantom and patients. The accuracy and precision of the BMD measurements were assessed using relative measurement error (RME%), coefficient of variation (CV%), root mean square standard deviation (RMS-SD), and root mean square CV (RMS-%CV). Linear regression and Bland‒Altman analyses were used to assess the agreement between 100 and 120 kV QCT-based BMD measurements. The diagnostic performance of 100 kV QCT for osteoporosis was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. For the ESP, the mean BMD values at 100 kV were slightly greater than those at 120 kV, mainly due to small inaccuracies remaining in the BMD calibration process. The RME% values for all vertebrae were -3.31 to 15.00% at 100 kV and -9.34 to 3.06% at 120 kV, falling within ± 10% at 120 kV but within 0‒15% at 100 kV. The CV% and RMS-%CV values decreased as the BMD increased with increasing tube voltage, while the RMS-SD exhibited a decreasing trend. For patients, linear regression and Bland‒Altman analyses revealed good agreement between 120 and 100 kV (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
40593161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.