ArticleScientific reports2025
Electrical discharge machining by rapid tools prepared by micro stereo-lithography process with copper metallization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics-Driven Deep Feature Fusion: A Lightweight CSAKansformer Architecture for Tool Wear Diagnosis in P25 Turning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The surface texture properties after electrical discharge machining with negative polarity using graphite electrodes of different grain sizes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid tooling (RT) has evolved into an emerging area in the field of manufacturing for fabricating tools potentially reducing machining time and cost allowing higher levels of geometric freedom. In this work, the application of RT technique in electrical discharge machining (EDM) has been explored. RT tools fabricated by micro stereo-lithography (micro-SLA) are coated with thick copper coatings by electroless metallization and electroplating to be used during EDM to machine 304 L stainless steel work piece material. The performance of the RT tools is compared with massive copper tool results considering output performance measures like material removal rate, tool wear rate, surface roughness, and surface crack density. The machined work piece surfaces and tool surfaces are analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The proposed RT tools have shown a higher material removal rate than the conventionally used massive copper tool. In addition, micro-cracks formed on the machined surfaces using RT tools are comparatively less. Nevertheless, the RT tools have higher tool wear rate and higher surface roughness on the machined surfaces as compared to the massive copper tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.