ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of normalisation strategies for qPCR data obtained from canine gastrointestinal tissues with different pathologies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is widely used to quantify gene expression at the mRNA level and confirm RNAseq results. Normalisation is a critical process used to minimise technical variability introduced during sample processing. To achieve this, reference genes (RGs), known for their stable expression across conditions, are commonly used as a baseline for accurate comparison. In canine intestinal tissue, there are no published studies validating RGs or other normalisation strategies. This study aimed to identify the best normalisation method in qPCR data from intestinal tissue biopsies of healthy dogs and in dogs suffering from gastrointestinal disease. RNA later-preserved tissue from healthy dogs and dogs with different gastrointestinal pathologies was used for RNA isolation and subsequent qPCR. Ninety-six genes were profiled using a qPCR high-throughput platform. Eleven RGs were included in the investigation. The RGs were ranked based on their stability using two standard methods (GeNorm and NormFinder). Normalisation including one to five of the most stable RGs and the global mean (GM) of the expression of all tested genes as an alternative normalisation method were investigated. The global mean expression was the best-performing normalisation method. Three RGs (RPS5, RPL8 and HMBS) were suitably stable RGs for normalising qPCR data when profiling small sets of genes in canine gastrointestinal tissue with different pathology. Furthermore, in our experimental set-up, with multiple tissues under different conditions, the implementation of the GM method is advisable when a set greater than 55 genes is profiled.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.