ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated ejection fraction and risk stratification in cardiomyopathy patients with diverse LV geometry using 2D echocardiography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiomyopathy often alters left ventricular geometry (LVG), impairing cardiac function. We developed a deep learning (DL) model to estimate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from echocardiographic images while accounting for LVG variability and assessed prognostic factors across LVG subtypes. For all patients with cardiomyopathy, we computed LV volume on apical two- and four-chamber views processed with novel DeepLabV3+ algorithm and calculate EF using Simpson's method. The model was pre-trained on public data, then validated in 120 patients classified into concentric hypertrophy (CH), eccentric hypertrophy (EH), concentric remodeling (CR), or normal geometry (NG). Outcomes included cardiac death and heart failure rehospitalization, analyzed via logistic and LASSO regression within each LVG subtype. The model achieved high LV segmentation accuracy, with an overall Dice similarity coefficient of 90.07% and IoU of 82.17%. Subgroup analysis on A4C images showed Dice/IoU values of 92.49%/86.34% (NG), 88.91%/80.11% (CR), 88.81%/80.23% (CH), and 89.75%/81.59% (EH). The mean absolute error in LVEF estimation was 4.70%, and Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of 0.95 ± 4.53% (95% limits, - 7.92% to 9.82%; P = 0.002) between AI-predicted and manual LVEF measurements. Subgroup analysis revealed r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.