Trial reportScientific reports2025
Transcranial direct current stimulation over motor cortex improves pain in end stage renal disease a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving pain management and physical function remains a significant challenge for patients affected by end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have gained attention for their potential to alleviate pain and improve functional outcomes. This study explored the effects of tDCS on pain, fatigue, and functional performance in patients affected by ESRD undergoing hemodialysis and experiencing chronic pain. Thirty-four participants were randomized to receive either active or sham tDCS, with 15 sessions administered over five weeks. Anodal tDCS over C3 with an intensity of 2 mA was administered in 15 sessions, 3 times per week. Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), fatigue, functional performance (sit-to-stand test, stationary walk, timed up and go test (TUG), elbow flexion test, and manual dynamometry) were assessed. We found a significant difference in VAS (p < 0.001) between groups and across time (fifteenth session p < 0.001; at the first, p < 0.001; and second follow-up, p < 0.001). TUG showed significant differences between-group analysis (p = 0.009). No significant differences between groups were observed for fatigue (p = 0.21) and all others functional tests. These findings suggest that tDCS may be a promising, non-invasive intervention for managing pain and improving mobility in patients affected by ESRD undergoing hemodialysis. Future studies with larger samples and extended follow-ups are warranted to further validate these findings and explore the long-term benefits of tDCS. Trial registration: The study is registered on the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ID: RBR-7kym6v8).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.