Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593133›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Transcranial direct current stimulation over motor cortex improves pain in end stage renal disease a randomized controlled trial.

Eduarda Fonseca Mendes, Edson Silva-Filho, Joanna Brito Holanda, M G L Matias, Tatiana Camila Lima, Sara Costa, Artur Quintiliano, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Felipe Fregni, Rodrigo Pegado

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eduarda Fonseca MendesGraduate Program in Heath Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, 620 Nilo Peçanha St., Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, 59012-300, Brazil.
Edson Silva-FilhoGraduate Program in Heath Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, 620 Nilo Peçanha St., Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, 59012-300, Brazil. emailmeneses@gmail.com.
Joanna Brito HolandaGraduate Program in Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
M G L MatiasGraduate Program in Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Tatiana Camila LimaGraduate Program in Heath Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, 620 Nilo Peçanha St., Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, 59012-300, Brazil.
Sara CostaGraduate Program in Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Artur QuintilianoDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Kevin Pacheco-BarriosNeuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Felipe FregniNeuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Rodrigo PegadoGraduate Program in Heath Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, 620 Nilo Peçanha St., Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, 59012-300, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving pain management and physical function remains a significant challenge for patients affected by end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have gained attention for their potential to alleviate pain and improve functional outcomes. This study explored the effects of tDCS on pain, fatigue, and functional performance in patients affected by ESRD undergoing hemodialysis and experiencing chronic pain. Thirty-four participants were randomized to receive either active or sham tDCS, with 15 sessions administered over five weeks. Anodal tDCS over C3 with an intensity of 2 mA was administered in 15 sessions, 3 times per week. Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), fatigue, functional performance (sit-to-stand test, stationary walk, timed up and go test (TUG), elbow flexion test, and manual dynamometry) were assessed. We found a significant difference in VAS (p < 0.001) between groups and across time (fifteenth session p < 0.001; at the first, p < 0.001; and second follow-up, p < 0.001). TUG showed significant differences between-group analysis (p = 0.009). No significant differences between groups were observed for fatigue (p = 0.21) and all others functional tests. These findings suggest that tDCS may be a promising, non-invasive intervention for managing pain and improving mobility in patients affected by ESRD undergoing hemodialysis. Future studies with larger samples and extended follow-ups are warranted to further validate these findings and explore the long-term benefits of tDCS. Trial registration: The study is registered on the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ID: RBR-7kym6v8).

Indexed as

Chronic PainKidney Failure, ChronicMotor CortexPain ManagementTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultAgedFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRenal DialysisTreatment OutcomeChronic painHemodialysisNeuromodulationNoninvasive brain stimulationRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40593133
PMCPMC12216100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.