Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593112›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cognitive difference text classification in online knowledge collaboration based on SA-BiLSTM hybrid model.

Fengjun Liu, Na Zhao, Guoqing Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fengjun LiuSchool of Health Management, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, 264003, China. liufengjunmail@163.com.
Na ZhaoSchool of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai, 264005, China.
Guoqing ZhuSchool of Health Management, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, 264003, China.

Funding

Binzhou Medical university 50012304615Shandong Federation of Social Sciences 24H054(Z)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the process of online knowledge collaboration, complex cognitive-difference texts are continually generated through collaborative editing processes. Effectively identifying and classifying these cognitive difference texts enables contributors to stay updated on the current status of knowledge editing, thereby enhancing group collaboration efficiency. However, accurate extraction of semantic features and contextual patterns from such texts remains challenging in multi-dimensional discourse contexts. To address this limitation, we developed a classification system based on the mapping relationship between conceptual relationships and cognitive differences. Based on this framework, we proposed a hybrid SA-BiLSTM architecture that integrates self-attention mechanisms with bidirectional long short-term memory networks for fine-grained cognitive difference text categorization. This study evaluated the SA-BiLSTM model through systematic experimentation with the Baidu Encyclopedia dataset, focusing on three aspects: architectural ablation studies comparing variant structures, comparative analyses with mainstream baseline models (FastText, TextCNN, RNN, BERT, and RoBERTa), and evaluations of the model's generalization and robustness. Experimental results indicate that the proposed model achieves superior classification accuracy compared to conventional approaches, demonstrates effective mitigation of semantic ambiguity, and exhibits enhanced domain adaptation capabilities. The findings highlight the framework's technical advantages in integrating attention mechanisms with sequential modeling, providing a viable solution for cognitive difference analysis in large-scale knowledge collaboration platforms.

Indexed as

CognitionModels, TheoreticalCooperative BehaviorHumansKnowledgeSemanticsBiLSTMCognitive differencesKnowledge collaborationSelf-attention mechanismText classification

Identifiers

PMID40593112
PMCPMC12216035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.