ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of the diagnostic concordance of FDA-approved PD-L1 assays in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Renal cell carcinoma: molecular understanding and therapeutic development.Cell death and differentiation · 2026Review
- From Genes to Proteins: The Indispensable Role of Proteogenomics in Advancing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Association Between Polymorphisms in Genes Encoding PD-1/PD-L1 Molecules and Clinicopathological Features in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Therapeutic strategies for advanced renal cell carcinoma have advanced dramatically since the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors. To date, four PD-L1 assays have been established as companion diagnostic tools for checkpoint inhibitors. However, all PD-L1 assays present several limitations in terms of concordance and compatibility. In this study, we constructed tissue microarrays from 286 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tissue samples and evaluated PD-L1 expression using the 22C3, 28 - 8, SP142, and SP263 PD-L1 assays. Detection of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was very low for all PD-L1 assays tested, although expression of PD-L1 in immune cells in the tumor area was 14.7% for 22C3, 16.1% for 28 - 8, 2.1% for SP142, and 15.0% for SP263. PD-L1 expression on immune cells assessed by 28 - 8 showed a moderate pairwise concordance with other assays (κ statistics: 0.52 with 22C3, 0.16 with SP142, and 0.46 with SP263). Patients with PD-L1 expression in immune cells evaluated using 22C3, 28 - 8, and SP263 showed significantly worse cancer-specific survival. PD-L1 expression on renal cell carcinoma tissues assessed using 22C3, 28 - 8, SP142, and SP263 did not show good concordance. In conclusion, differences between these assays should be considered when evaluating the results of immunohistochemical findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.