Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593071›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of the diagnostic concordance of FDA-approved PD-L1 assays in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Yoko Koh, Taigo Kato, Gaku Yamamichi, Eisuke Tomiyama, Makoto Matsushita, Koji Hatano, Atsunari Kawashima, Norio Nonomura, Motohide Uemura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yoko KohDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Taigo KatoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. kato@uro.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Gaku YamamichiDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Eisuke TomiyamaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Makoto MatsushitaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Koji HatanoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Atsunari KawashimaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Norio NonomuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Motohide UemuraDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1, Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan. muemura@fmu.ac.jp.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP 20K18113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic strategies for advanced renal cell carcinoma have advanced dramatically since the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors. To date, four PD-L1 assays have been established as companion diagnostic tools for checkpoint inhibitors. However, all PD-L1 assays present several limitations in terms of concordance and compatibility. In this study, we constructed tissue microarrays from 286 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tissue samples and evaluated PD-L1 expression using the 22C3, 28 - 8, SP142, and SP263 PD-L1 assays. Detection of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was very low for all PD-L1 assays tested, although expression of PD-L1 in immune cells in the tumor area was 14.7% for 22C3, 16.1% for 28 - 8, 2.1% for SP142, and 15.0% for SP263. PD-L1 expression on immune cells assessed by 28 - 8 showed a moderate pairwise concordance with other assays (κ statistics: 0.52 with 22C3, 0.16 with SP142, and 0.46 with SP263). Patients with PD-L1 expression in immune cells evaluated using 22C3, 28 - 8, and SP263 showed significantly worse cancer-specific survival. PD-L1 expression on renal cell carcinoma tissues assessed using 22C3, 28 - 8, SP142, and SP263 did not show good concordance. In conclusion, differences between these assays should be considered when evaluating the results of immunohistochemical findings.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedTissue Array AnalysisUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanClear cell renal cell carcinomaCompanion diagnosticsImmunohistochemistryNext-generation sequencingProgramed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)

Identifiers

PMID40593071
PMCPMC12218980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.