Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593069›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Interaction behavior between coarse-particle pyrite and fine-particle pyrite in flotation.

Xianchen Wang, Hong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xianchen WangSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Moutai Institute, Renhuai, 564507, China. wangxianchen@mtxy.edu.cn.
Hong LiSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Moutai Institute, Renhuai, 564507, China.

Funding

Science and Technology Program of Department of Education of Guizhou Province Qian Jiao Ji [2022]411the Project of Moutai Institute High-level Talent Scientific Research mygccrc[2022]062the Project supported by the Innovation Project of Engineering Research Center of Phosphorus Resources Development and Utilization of Ministry of Education LKF202301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pyrite is commonly associated with gold deposits and serves as a gold-bearing mineral. The flotation recovery of gold-bearing pyrite generally determines the overall gold recovery. In this study, pyrite from a gold ore in southwestern Guizhou Province was selected to investigate the interaction behavior between coarse-particle pyrite (CPy) and fine-particle pyrite (FPy) during flotation. Flotation tests were conducted in combination with laser particle size analysis, optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS), and a self-assembled "Particle Attachment Dynamic Observation System." The results showed that the recovery of FPy (P80 = 26.75 µm) was lower than that of CPy (P80 = 147.89 µm) under the same collector concentration (butyl xanthate). However, the flotation recovery of the CPy-FPy mixture was consistently higher than that of either CPy or FPy alone, particularly at low collector concentrations. Further investigation confirmed that CPy acted as a carrier for FPy, enhancing its recovery into the froth during mixed flotation. Calculations based on the extended Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (EDLVO) model demonstrated that butyl xanthate increases hydrophobic forces between pyrite particles, promoting agglomeration. This finding explains why the flotation recovery of the CPy-FPy mixture in a butyl xanthate suspension exceeds that of CPy or FPy alone.

Indexed as

Coarse particlesFine particlesFlotationGold-bearing pyriteInteraction behavior

Identifiers

PMID40593069
PMCPMC12217499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.