ArticleScientific reports2025
Different prefrontal cortex activity patterns in bipolar and unipolar depression during verbal fluency tasks based on functional near infrared spectroscopy study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal disruption of prefrontal dynamics during affective association in depression: an fNIRS case-control study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Machine learning classification of fNIRS signals in patients with major depressive disorder and healthy controls.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the functionality of the prefrontal cortex in patients with unipolar depression (UD) and bipolar depression (BD) using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during a verbal fluency task (VFT). Additionally, it evaluated the reliability of fNIRS as a diagnostic tool for cognitive assessments through a deep learning approach using one-dimensional convolutional networks. The study included 73 patients with UD, 59 patients with BD, and 40 healthy controls (HC). Hemodynamic responses in the prefrontal cortex were recorded using fNIRS during the VFT. Differences in oxygenated hemoglobin concentrations across the three groups were compared, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for each region of interest. Both UD and BD patients demonstrated significantly reduced activation in the prefrontal cortex compared to healthy controls. UD patients showed notably lower activation values than BD patients in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, frontopolar prefrontal cortex, left orbitofrontal cortex, and left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. The highest classification accuracy (79.57%) was observed in the left orbitofrontal cortex. The UD group had the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.99) in the left orbitofrontal cortex, while the BD group had the largest AUC (0.91) in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The HC group exhibited the largest AUC (0.73) in the same region. The DLPFC, FPC, lOFC, and lVLPFC may serve as biomarker regions for differentiating UD from BD. The combination of fNIRS and the VFT shows promise as a supplementary diagnostic tool for mental health disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.