ArticleScientific reports2025
A highly generalized federated learning algorithm for brain tumor segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Efficient and Cohesive System for Enhanced Accuracy in Malignant Brain Tumor Diagnosis.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- Performance of federated versus centralized learning for mammography classification across film-digital domain shift.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain image segmentation plays a pivotal role in modern healthcare by enabling precise diagnosis and treatment planning. Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across institutions while safeguarding sensitive patient data. The integration of these technologies holds significant potential for advancing artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare. However, medical institutions frequently encounter data imbalances, where some have limited annotated brain imaging data, whereas others possess larger datasets and more diverse cases. Such data exhibit non-independent, non-identically distributed characteristics, which adversely affect segmentation accuracy and generalizability. To address these issues, this paper proposes a client-side brain tumor image segmentation model utilizing Virtual Adversarial Training (VAT) integrated into a 3D U-Net to improve model performance under conditions of limited datasets, effectively addressing data scarcity and imbalance within the federated learning environment by optimizing the use of brain tumor image data held by each client. FedHG introduces an effective federated model aggregation strategy that leverages key parameters, specifically the 'weights' derived from a public validation dataset. Additionally, instance normalization parameters are incorporated into client models during training. These strategies collectively enhance the generalizability of the federated model. Empirical experiments validate the proposed algorithm, showing a 2.2% improvement in the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) for brain tumor segmentation over the baseline federated learning algorithm, with a marginal 3% reduction in performance compared to centralized training, highlighting its practical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.