Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593041›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A highly generalized federated learning algorithm for brain tumor segmentation.

Jun Wen, Xiusheng Li, Xin Ye, Xiaoli Li, Hang Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jun WenSchool of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. wenjun@uestc.edu.cn.
Xiusheng LiSichuan Xinwang Bank, China, No. 8, Jitai Road, Chengdu High-Tech Zone, Chengdu, China.
Xin YeSchool of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoli LiComputer School, HuBei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China.
Hang MaoSichuan Xinwang Bank, China, No. 8, Jitai Road, Chengdu High-Tech Zone, Chengdu, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62306108Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province in China 2023AFB042Xinwang bank UESTC joint fund xw2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain image segmentation plays a pivotal role in modern healthcare by enabling precise diagnosis and treatment planning. Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across institutions while safeguarding sensitive patient data. The integration of these technologies holds significant potential for advancing artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare. However, medical institutions frequently encounter data imbalances, where some have limited annotated brain imaging data, whereas others possess larger datasets and more diverse cases. Such data exhibit non-independent, non-identically distributed characteristics, which adversely affect segmentation accuracy and generalizability. To address these issues, this paper proposes a client-side brain tumor image segmentation model utilizing Virtual Adversarial Training (VAT) integrated into a 3D U-Net to improve model performance under conditions of limited datasets, effectively addressing data scarcity and imbalance within the federated learning environment by optimizing the use of brain tumor image data held by each client. FedHG introduces an effective federated model aggregation strategy that leverages key parameters, specifically the 'weights' derived from a public validation dataset. Additionally, instance normalization parameters are incorporated into client models during training. These strategies collectively enhance the generalizability of the federated model. Empirical experiments validate the proposed algorithm, showing a 2.2% improvement in the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) for brain tumor segmentation over the baseline federated learning algorithm, with a marginal 3% reduction in performance compared to centralized training, highlighting its practical applicability.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrain NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedArtificial IntelligenceFederated LearningHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain tumor segmentationFederated learningMachine learningModel aggregationVirtual adversarial training

Identifiers

PMID40593041
PMCPMC12218099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.