ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a modified SOFA score for mortality prediction in candidemia patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- 30-day mortality and antifungal resistance in confirmed Candida auris bloodstream infections (BSI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Infection · 2026Review
- Temporal changes in mortality and risk factors of candidemia in intensive care unit patients.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Risk Factors of Mortality in Older Patients With Candidemia.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Candidemia is a life-threatening bloodstream infection associated with high mortality rates, particularly in critically ill patients. Accurate risk stratification is crucial for timely intervention and could improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to enhance the predictive performance of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score by developing a modified SOFA (mSOFA) score, which is specifically designed for candidemia patients. Using data from MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, and ICU-JN databases, we identified key prognostic variables through LASSO regression and integrated into the mSOFA_3 model. The model incorporated respiratory_SOFA, coagulation_SOFA, and circulatory_SOFA along with clinical biomarkers, including lactate, albumin, and blood urea nitrogen. The mSOFA_3 model demonstrated superior predictive performance across multiple machine learning algorithms, with the logistic regression-based model achieving the highest AUC of 0.826 in the internal validation cohort and 0.813 in the test cohort. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis further validated the model's utility in stratifying patients into high-risk and low-risk groups with distinct survival outcomes. These findings highlight the mSOFA_3 as a robust and clinically relevant tool for early risk stratification, offering potential for improved decision-making and therapeutic management in critically ill patients with candidemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.