Trial reportScientific reports2025
Osimertinib plus chemotherapy versus osimertinib for patients with advanced NSCLC with concomitant EGFR and TP53 mutations: a prospective cohort study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review and network meta-analysis of first-line EGFR-TKI-based combination strategies for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- EGFR Mutations and Recurrence Outcomes in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Updated 2015-2025 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Risk-adapted first-line therapy selection in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC: a practical clinical algorithm integrating tumor biology and patient factors.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Exploring the Impact of Multiple Gene Mutations on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Response in Asian Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Review
- Osimertinib with chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with vaginal metastasis harboringGynecology and pelvic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osimertinib is the standard first-line options for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Co-mutations in TP53 results in poor survival for patients. However, the studies on treatment options and clinical outcomes of patients with EGFR-TP53 co- mutation are limited. Patients with EGFR mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC carrying TP53 mutations were recruited from two institutions and randomly allocated into two groups, either receiving osimertinib plus chemotherapy (Osi + Chemo group) or osimertinib monotherapy (Osi group). The progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated as the primary endpoint and the response was also assessed. Between January 2020 and August 2023, ninety-eight patients were enrolled with 47 and 51 patients receiving combination therapy and the monotherapy. After a median follow-up of 19.2 months, overall response rate (ORR) was 80.0% vs. 71.7% (p = 0.36), favoring Osi + Chemo group, as well as in disease control rate (DCR) (91.4% vs. 80.4%, p = 0.45). The median PFS in the Osi + Chemo group was 26.0 months versus 20.7 months in the Osi group, but there was no significant difference (p = 0.34). The subgroup analysis indicated that for patients with L858R mutation, Osi + Chemo therapy significantly prolonged the median PFS (not reached [NR] versus 17.1 months, p = 0.03), but showed no benefit in patients with 19Del (20.6 months versus NR, p = 0.31). Osimertinib plus chemotherapy has a tendency to increase ORR and prolong PFS in NSCLC with EGFR and TP53 co-mutations, particularly in patients with L858R mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.