ArticleScientific reports2025
Reform and innovation of physical education teaching methods in universities based on fuzzy decision support systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Foregrounding motivational climate in university physical education: a mixed-methods latent profile analysis with classroom prescriptions.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Innovative Physical Education (PE) teaching methods rely on technologies and innovative environments to improve the fitness and efficiency of students. Such teaching/ training methods need periodic assessments to improve quality and cope with modern trends. This article introduces an Active Teaching Assessment Method (ATAM) using fuzzy decision support systems (FDSS). By analyzing performance data and physiological features, a Fuzzy Decision Support System may provide individualized training programs for athletes. FDSS considers factors like fitness level, recovery rate, and injury history to provide personalized suggestions. The fuzzy generates a series of membership functions based on the different performance levels of the students. Such performance levels provide optimal efficacy-adhered teaching methods randomly. The random outputs are combined based on student feasibility factors; the feasibility factors include PE time and academic performance. The active assessments are classified based on suitable outputs to persuade new PE sessions. The assessment is provided using fuzzy decision recommendation through feasible derivative improvements. In this process, the fuzzy derivatives only consider the best-fit (maximum efficient) teaching method. Therefore, the recommendations from the best fit are provided with a much better assessment from the previous sessions. With 12 categories, it can handle various classroom situations and student requirements. Compared to other methodologies, ATAM's evaluation time of 75 s is the shortest, indicating excellent efficiency. Lastly, an output combination percentage of 85% best integrates performance and recommendation indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.