Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593000›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Lessons learned from RadiologyNET foundation models for transfer learning in medical radiology.

Mateja Napravnik, Franko Hržić, Martin Urschler, Damir Miletić, Ivan Štajduhar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mateja NapravnikFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia.
Franko HržićCenter for Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity, University of Rijeka, Radmile Matejcic 2, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia. franko.hrzic@uniri.hr.
Martin UrschlerInstitute for Medical Informatics Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Damir MiletićUniversity of Rijeka, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Krešimirova 42, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia.
Ivan ŠtajduharFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia.

Funding

Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost IP-2020-02-3770University of Rijeka uniri-mladi- tehnic-23-19 3070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning models require large amounts of annotated data, which are hard to obtain in the medical field, as the annotation process is laborious and depends on expert knowledge. This data scarcity hinders a model's ability to generalise effectively on unseen data, and recently, foundation models pretrained on large datasets have been proposed as a promising solution. RadiologyNET is a custom medical dataset that comprises 1,902,414 medical images covering various body parts and modalities of image acquisition. We used the RadiologyNET dataset to pretrain several popular architectures (ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, VGG16, EfficientNetB3, EfficientNetB4, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, MobileNetV3Small and MobileNetV3Large). We compared the performance of ImageNet and RadiologyNET foundation models against training from randomly initialiased weights on several publicly available medical datasets: (i) Segmentation-LUng Nodule Analysis Challenge, (ii) Regression-RSNA Pediatric Bone Age Challenge, (iii) Binary classification-GRAZPEDWRI-DX and COVID-19 datasets, and (iv) Multiclass classification-Brain Tumor MRI dataset. Our results indicate that RadiologyNET-pretrained models generally perform similarly to ImageNet models, with some advantages in resource-limited settings. However, ImageNet-pretrained models showed competitive performance when fine-tuned on sufficient data. The impact of modality diversity on model performance was tested, with the results varying across tasks, highlighting the importance of aligning pretraining data with downstream applications. Based on our findings, we provide guidelines for using foundation models in medical applications and publicly release our RadiologyNET-pretrained models to support further research and development in the field. The models are available at https://github.com/AIlab-RITEH/RadiologyNET-TL-models .

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiologyCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2ClassificationFoundation modelsModel pretrainingRadiologyNETRegressionSegmentationTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40593000
PMCPMC12215656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.