ArticleScientific reports2025
Lessons learned from RadiologyNET foundation models for transfer learning in medical radiology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application and integration of deep learning in tumour radiomics: bibliometrics and visualisation analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Foundation models in radiology: a primer for pediatric radiologists.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Improved AI-Assisted Image Recognition of Cervical Spine Vertebrae Enables Motion Pattern Analysis in Dynamic X-Ray Recordings.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A modern radiologist's guide to artificial intelligence.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- CT radiomics with transfer learning features for detecting DECT-positive periarticular monosodium urate crystal deposition: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning models require large amounts of annotated data, which are hard to obtain in the medical field, as the annotation process is laborious and depends on expert knowledge. This data scarcity hinders a model's ability to generalise effectively on unseen data, and recently, foundation models pretrained on large datasets have been proposed as a promising solution. RadiologyNET is a custom medical dataset that comprises 1,902,414 medical images covering various body parts and modalities of image acquisition. We used the RadiologyNET dataset to pretrain several popular architectures (ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, VGG16, EfficientNetB3, EfficientNetB4, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, MobileNetV3Small and MobileNetV3Large). We compared the performance of ImageNet and RadiologyNET foundation models against training from randomly initialiased weights on several publicly available medical datasets: (i) Segmentation-LUng Nodule Analysis Challenge, (ii) Regression-RSNA Pediatric Bone Age Challenge, (iii) Binary classification-GRAZPEDWRI-DX and COVID-19 datasets, and (iv) Multiclass classification-Brain Tumor MRI dataset. Our results indicate that RadiologyNET-pretrained models generally perform similarly to ImageNet models, with some advantages in resource-limited settings. However, ImageNet-pretrained models showed competitive performance when fine-tuned on sufficient data. The impact of modality diversity on model performance was tested, with the results varying across tasks, highlighting the importance of aligning pretraining data with downstream applications. Based on our findings, we provide guidelines for using foundation models in medical applications and publicly release our RadiologyNET-pretrained models to support further research and development in the field. The models are available at https://github.com/AIlab-RITEH/RadiologyNET-TL-models .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.