ArticleScientific reports2025
Language models learn to represent antigenic properties of human influenza A(H3) virus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- What Does the Shape Space of T Cell Epitopes Look Like?Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- FluAttn: Antigenicity prediction of influenza A/H3N2 through attention-based feature mining.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2026Article
- Inferring context-specific site variation with evotuned protein language models.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given that influenza vaccine effectiveness depends on a good antigenic match between the vaccine and circulating viruses, it is important to assess the antigenic properties of newly emerging variants continuously. With the increasing application of real-time pathogen genomic surveillance, a key question is if antigenic properties can reliably be predicted from influenza virus genomic information. Based on validated linked datasets of influenza virus genomic and wet lab experimental results, in silico models may be of use to learn to predict immune escape of variants of interest starting from the protein sequence only. In this study, we compared several machine-learning methods to reconstruct antigenic map coordinates for HA1 protein sequences of influenza A(H3N2) virus, to rank substitutions responsible for major antigenic changes, and to recognize variants with novel antigenic properties that may warrant future vaccine updates. Methods based on deep learning language models (BiLSTM and ProtBERT) and more classical approaches based solely on genetic distances and physicochemical properties of amino acid sequences had comparable performances over the coarser features of the map, but the first two performed better over fine-grained features like single amino acid-driven antigenic change and in silico deep mutational scanning experiments to rank the substitutions with the largest impact on antigenic properties. Given that the best performing model that produces protein embeddings is agnostic to the specific pathogen, the presented approach may be applicable to other pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.