ArticleScientific reports2025
Ultrasound-based classification of follicular thyroid Cancer using deep convolutional neural networks with transfer learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligent Diagnosis of Follicular Carcinoma Thyroid Cancer with a Novel Deep Learning Model.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Innovative fusion models: elevating preoperative gross ETE prediction in thyroid cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based classification of thyroid nodules using uncertainty-aware multi-modal ultrasound imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate convolutional neural network (CNN) models for distinguishing follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) from follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA). Additionally, this current study compared the performance of CNN models with the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS) and Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) ultrasound-based malignancy risk stratification systems. A total of 327 eligible patients with FTC and FTA who underwent preoperative thyroid ultrasound examination were retrospectively enrolled between August 2017, and August 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 263) and a test cohort (n = 64) in an 8:2 ratio using stratified sampling. Five CNN models, including VGG16, ResNet101, MobileNetV2, ResNet152, and ResNet50, pre-trained with ImageNet, were developed and tested to distinguish FTC from FTA. The CNN models exhibited good performance, yielding areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranging from 0.64 to 0.77. The ResNet152 model demonstrated the highest AUC (0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.87) for distinguishing between FTC and FTA. Decision curve and calibration curve analyses demonstrated the models' favorable clinical value and calibration. Furthermore, when comparing the performance of the developed models with that of the C-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS systems, the models developed in this study demonstrated superior performance. This can potentially guide appropriate management of FTC in patients with follicular neoplasms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.