Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40592939›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Identification of novel gene-based risk score for prognosis in prostate cancer.

Huangwei Huang, Xia Sun, Peixin Li, Haoxin Cai, Lejia Xu, Benkang Shi, Sifeng Qu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huangwei HuangDepartment of Urology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xia SunDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Peixin LiDepartment of Urology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Haoxin CaiDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Lejia XuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Benkang ShiDepartment of Urology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. bkang68@sdu.edu.cn.
Sifeng QuDepartment of Urology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. qusifeng@sdu.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing Bethune Charitable Foundation mnzl202016China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2020M672066China Primary Health Care Foundation 0013CSCO-Pilot Cancer Research Foundation Y-2019AZQN-0039Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2021A1515220181Joint Fund of Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2021LSW026Shandong Province Postdoctoral Innovation Project 202002010the National Natural Science Foundation, China 81872894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor carcinogenesis and progression result from multiple genetic alterations in tumor cells. However, reliable biomarkers for prostate cancer classification remain limited, often leading to either overtreatment or inadequate treatment. Additionally, effective biomarkers for selecting patients who may benefit from immunotherapy are still lacking. Using data from TCGA-PRAD, we established gene selection criteria to develop a gene-based risk score. We identified a novel gene risk panel comprising six genes (SSTR1, CA14, HJURP, KRTAP5-1, VGF, and COMP) for prostate cancer risk classification. Patients in the high-risk group were associated with poor prognosis. The gene panel exhibited significantly enhanced predictive accuracy for progression-free survival compared to conventional clinicopathological parameters, including T stage, N stage, primary Gleason score, and secondary Gleason score. High-risk patients exhibited a higher tumor mutation burden. Notably, immune activity of CD8 + T cells, NK cells, and the type II IFN response was significantly lower in the high-risk group, indicating a more immunosuppressive environment. Furthermore, a nomogram combining the gene-based risk score with T stage and histological grade was constructed. The expression of genes in the gene-based risk score was further validated using clinical samples, and VGF was found to play a significant role in prostate cancer progression. The nomogram could serve as a valuable biomarker for distinguishing between high-risk and low-risk of PFS prostate cancer patients and for selecting patients who might benefit from immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorProstatic NeoplasmsAgedGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNomogramsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorGene-based risk scoreImmune landscapeProstate cancerVGF

Identifiers

PMID40592939
PMCPMC12219829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.