ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of novel gene-based risk score for prognosis in prostate cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Gene Feature Based on Histone Modifications Can Predict the Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Tissue microRNA Profiling Identifies Prognostic Signatures in Prostate Cancer and Highlights CPEB3 as a Candidate Biomarker.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor carcinogenesis and progression result from multiple genetic alterations in tumor cells. However, reliable biomarkers for prostate cancer classification remain limited, often leading to either overtreatment or inadequate treatment. Additionally, effective biomarkers for selecting patients who may benefit from immunotherapy are still lacking. Using data from TCGA-PRAD, we established gene selection criteria to develop a gene-based risk score. We identified a novel gene risk panel comprising six genes (SSTR1, CA14, HJURP, KRTAP5-1, VGF, and COMP) for prostate cancer risk classification. Patients in the high-risk group were associated with poor prognosis. The gene panel exhibited significantly enhanced predictive accuracy for progression-free survival compared to conventional clinicopathological parameters, including T stage, N stage, primary Gleason score, and secondary Gleason score. High-risk patients exhibited a higher tumor mutation burden. Notably, immune activity of CD8 + T cells, NK cells, and the type II IFN response was significantly lower in the high-risk group, indicating a more immunosuppressive environment. Furthermore, a nomogram combining the gene-based risk score with T stage and histological grade was constructed. The expression of genes in the gene-based risk score was further validated using clinical samples, and VGF was found to play a significant role in prostate cancer progression. The nomogram could serve as a valuable biomarker for distinguishing between high-risk and low-risk of PFS prostate cancer patients and for selecting patients who might benefit from immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.