ArticleScientific reports2025
Developing an innovative lung cancer detection model for accurate diagnosis in AI healthcare systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of lung cancer using Kronecker mobile forward harmonic net.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in non-small cell lung cancer: the current state of the science on multi-omic applications.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Review
- Multi-spatial channel attention and inceptionv3-based CAD system with optimized MLP for lung cancer detection.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Attention-Enhanced Hybrid Bidirectional LSTM and Temporal Convolutional Network for Early Detection of Lung Cancer in Low-Dose CT Scans.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026Article
- Browser-Based Multi-Cancer Classification Framework Using Depthwise Separable Convolutions for Precision Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate Lung cancer (LC) identification is a big medical problem in the AI-based healthcare systems. Various deep learning-based methods have been proposed for Lung cancer diagnosis. In this study, we proposed a Deep learning techniques-based integrated model (CNN-GRU) for Lung cancer detection. In the proposed model development Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and gated recurrent units (GRU) models are integrated to design an intelligent model for lung cancer detection. The CNN model extracts spatial features from lung CT images through convolutional and pooling layers. The extracted features from data are embedded in the GRUs model for the final prediction of LC. The model (CNN-GRU) was validated using LC data using the holdout validation technique. Data augmentation techniques such as rotation, and brightness were used to enlarge the data set size for effective training of the model. The optimization techniques Stochastic Gradient Descent(SGD) and Adaptive Moment Estimation(ADAM) were applied during model training for model training parameters optimization. Additionally, evaluation metrics were used to test the model performance. The experimental results of the model presented that the model achieved 99.77% accuracy as compared to previous models. The (CNN-GRU) model is recommended for accurate LC detection in AI-based healthcare systems due to its improved diagnosis accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.