Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40592911›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cerebellar reaching ataxia is exacerbated by timing demands and assistive interaction torques.

Kyunggeune Oh, Di Cao, Noah J Cowan, Amy J Bastian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyunggeune OhCenter for Movement Studies, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Di CaoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Noah J CowanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amy J BastianCenter for Movement Studies, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. bastian@kennedykrieger.org.

Funding

MECHANISMS AND REHABILITATION OF CEREBELLAR ATAXIAR01HD040289 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI BASTIAN, AMY J. · 2002 to 2022
$6.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD040289NIH HHS R01 HD040289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with cerebellar ataxia face significant challenges in controlling reaching, especially when multi-joint movements are involved. This study investigated the effects of kinematic and dynamic demands on reaching using a home-based virtual reality task. Participants with and without cerebellar ataxia reached to target locations designed to elicit a range of coordination strategies between shoulder and elbow joint movements. Compared with control subjects, cerebellar subjects presented greater initial reaching direction errors, larger hand trajectory curvatures, and more variability. Kinematic simulations indicated that early hand movement errors were sensitive to the required onset times and rates of joint movements and were most impaired when opposite direction joint movements were required (e.g., elbow extension with shoulder flexion). Dynamic analysis revealed that cerebellar participants' movements were more impaired in reaching directions where interaction torques would normally assist the desired elbow and shoulder movements. These reach directions were also those that required joint movements in opposite directions. Overall, our data suggest that reaching deficits in cerebellar ataxia result from (1) the early-phase motion planning deficits that are exacerbated by stringent timing coordination requirements and (2) the inability to compensate for interaction torques, particularly when they assist the intended movement.

Indexed as

Cerebellar AtaxiaAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaElbow JointFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementPsychomotor PerformanceRange of Motion, ArticularTorqueAtaxiaCerebellumCoordinationDynamicsKinematicsReaching

Identifiers

PMID40592911
PMCPMC12216649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.