ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated grading of rectocele with an MRI radiomics model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop an automated grading model for rectocele (RC) based on radiomics and evaluate its efficacy. This study retrospectively analyzed a total of 9,392 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images obtained from 222 patients who underwent dynamic magnetic resonance defecography (DMRD) over the period from August 2021 to June 2023. The focus was specifically on the defecation phase images of the DMRD, as this phase provides critical information for assessing RC. To develop and evaluate the model, the MRI images from all patients were randomly divided into two groups. 70% of the data were allocated to the training cohort to build the model, and the remaining 30% was reserved as a test cohort to evaluate its performance. First, the severity of RC was assessed using the RC MRI grading criteria by two independent radiologists. To extract and select radiomic features, two additional radiologists independently delineated the regions of interest (ROIs). These features were then dimensionality reduced to retain only the most relevant data for the analysis. The radiomics features were reduced in dimension, and a machine learning model was developed using a Support Vector Machine (SVM). Finally, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the classification efficiency of the model. The AUC (macro/micro) of the model using defecation phase images was 0.794/0.824, and the overall accuracy was 0.754. The radiomics model built using the combination of DMRD defecation phase images is well suited for grading RC and helping clinicians diagnose and treat the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.