ArticleScientific reports2025
Optogenetic restoration of high-sensitivity vision using ChRmine- and ChroME-based channelrhodopsins.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Restorative and regenerative therapies for vision loss.Eye (London, England) · 2026Review
- Using Virtual Patients to Predict Perceptual Outcomes for Optogenetic Sight Recovery Technologies.Research square · 2026Article
- Using Virtual Patients to Predict Perceptual Outcomes for Optogenetic Sight Recovery Technologies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Theoretical analysis of low-power optogenetic suppression of action potentials in human ventricular cardiomyocytes expressed with potassium-selective channelrhodopsins.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Functional methods for evaluating the efficacy of retinal optogenetic therapy for vision restoration.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optogenetic gene therapy is a promising mutation-independent treatment that aims to restore visual perception in patients blinded by retinal diseases that cause photoreceptor degeneration. Still, low sensitivity or slow kinetics of currently utilized optogenetic proteins limit the efficacy of such approaches. Here, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of three channelrhodopsin variants: ChRmine, from the algae Rhodomonas lens, ChRmine-T119A, a faster-closing ChRmine variant, and ChroME2s, a second-generation Chronos-based opsin.We expressed these opsins in retinal ganglion cells of rd1 mice, a model of severe retinal degeneration. Single cell electrophysiology demonstrates opsin's large sensitivity to a range of light intensities as well as opsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells generated action potentials in response to light stimulation. Behavioral tests showed ChRmine-T119A's efficacy at 360 lux compared to unmodified ChRmine and ChroME2s. ChRmine and ChroME2s did restore light perception at higher light intensities. Additionally, our dose-response study with ChRmine-T119A revealed that lower viral titers were more effective at restoring light sensitivity. Our study demonstrates that these ChRmine- and ChroME-based opsins can enhance vision in late-stage blinding diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.