ArticleNature communications2025
Thin-film lithium niobate photonic circuit for ray tracing acceleration.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-channel high-speed flip-chip packaging platform for thin-film lithium niobate photonic circuits.National science review · 2026Article
- Optically locked low-noise photonic microwave oscillator.National science review · 2026Article
- Emerging integrated photonic neural network technologies for artificial intelligence: from devices to systems.National science review · 2026Review
- Progress on Synergistic Enhancement of Perovskite Solar Cell Efficiency and Stability via Defect Engineering and Carrier Dynamics Optimization.Small methods · 2026Review
- Inverse-designed nanophotonic neural network accelerators for ultra-compact optical computing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Multi-target and ultra-high-speed optical wireless communication using a thin-film lithium niobate optical phased array.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-time, physically realistic rendering is a significant challenge in spatial computing systems due to the excessive computational intensity of ray tracing and the performance limitations of current electronic platform. Here, we propose and demonstrate the first photonic counterpart for ray tracing acceleration, capable of performing ray-box intersection tests in the optical domain. Leveraging the high bandwidth, high linearity, and superior efficiency of thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN), our photonic ray tracing core (PRTC) achieves significantly more rapid and energy-efficient computation compared to traditional electronic hardware. Furthermore, by exploiting the binary nature of ray-box intersection tests, we reduce the analog-to-digital converter (ADC) bit-width requirement to a single bit, effectively overcoming the primary bottleneck in analog computing accelerators-the power consumption dominated by ADCs. As a result, our PRTC achieves an energy efficiency of 326 femtojoules per operation (fJ/OP) and demonstrates a modulator bandwidth exceeding 100 GHz. This advancement achieves significant improvements in both speed and energy efficiency by orders of magnitude. Our work demonstrates the feasibility of using photonic chips for ray tracing, effectively circumventing the ADC bottleneck of optical computing systems, and paves the way for future innovations in high-performance, low-power spatial computing applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.