Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40592813›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Ocean deoxygenation after the Sturtian Snowball.

Kun Zhang, Susan H Little, Alexander J Dickson, Graham A Shields

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kun ZhangDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK. kun-zhang@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4346-9525
Susan H LittleDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9957-2636
Alexander J DicksonCentre of Climate, Ocean and Atmosphere, Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8928-4799
Graham A ShieldsDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7828-3966

Funding

RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/P013643/1RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/R010129/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The abrupt ending of the Sturtian 'Snowball' glaciation was characterised by enhanced chemical weathering and carbon cycle perturbations, but there is less certainty over how oxygen levels responded to those changes. Here we reconcile conflicting views using a carbonate-based multiproxy dataset from the Taishir Formation in Mongolia. The geochemical data reveal an episode of ocean deoxygenation, followed by a shift toward less reducing, but still largely anoxic conditions in a post-glacial ocean characterised by nutrient and sulfate limitation. Ocean redox dynamics and biogeochemical cycling following the Sturtian deglaciation were likely dictated by unique tectonic and climatic regimes that facilitated the buildup of a recalcitrant dissolved organic carbon pool in the deep ocean. Post-glacial eutrophication may help to explain the delayed diversification of algal clades, but the persistence of ocean anoxia, excepting transient oxidation pulses, likely hindered the emergence of obligate aerobes, such as animals, until the Ediacaran Period.

Identifiers

PMID40592813
PMCPMC12219592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.