ArticleBMJ open2025
Perceptions of human papillomavirus vaccination among adolescent boys and their parents in high-income countries: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HPV vaccination intention among guardians of male junior high school students in Chongqing, China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common cause of cervical cancer in women. However, among adolescent boys, initial exposure to HPV is associated with a higher risk of developing oropharyngeal and oral cancers compared with girls. Notably, the incidence of oropharyngeal cancer has been rising sharply in high-income countries, yet HPV vaccination coverage among adolescent boys remains suboptimal. Therefore, understanding the perceptions of adolescent boys and their parents regarding HPV vaccination in high-income countries is crucial for the development of effective public health strategies.
objectivesThis scoping review aims to explore the perceptions of adolescent boys and their parents regarding HPV vaccination and investigate the facilitating factors and barriers influencing HPV vaccination. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The method framework of Arksey and O'Malley, the Joanna Briggs Institute, as well as the recommendations of Levac will be used to conduct the scoping review. This scoping review will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews checklist. A systematic literature search will be performed on Ovid-MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Ovid-Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Two reviewers will independently perform the study selection and data extraction. Identified studies will be extracted using a customised extraction template on Covidence and analysed descriptively using narrative synthesis. The review commenced in April 2024 and will be completed in July 2025. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected for this study. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. REGISTRATION: This protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/M5NH2).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.