Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40592708›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2026

The Sleep Regularity Index: A New Way to Evaluate Shiftwork Schedules.

Jacob R Guzzetti, Panagiotis Matsangas, Siobhan Banks, Nita L Shattuck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fatigue-related factors and perceived team functioning in United States Navy Surface Forces.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacob R GuzzettiBehaviour-Brain-Body Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3149-4982
Panagiotis MatsangasCrew Endurance Team, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, USA.
Siobhan BanksBehaviour-Brain-Body Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7489-0929
Nita L ShattuckCrew Endurance Team, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sailors adhere to a variety of demanding shiftwork schedules (known as 'watchbills') which pose a challenge for sleep and wellbeing at sea. Previous research aimed at identifying viable watchbills based on how they protect sailors' sleep has largely relied on sleep duration. Findings have highlighted insufficient sleep during watchstanding but have mixed results when comparing across watchbills. Sleep regularity is another important dimension of sleep that has been rarely assessed during watchstanding. This study aimed to investigate sleep regularity assessment as a tool for evaluating watchbills, using a recently introduced metric-the Sleep Regularity Index (SRI). Two hundred eighteen sailors from different watchbills were assessed for approximately 1 week of an underway period. The median SRI score was significantly lower for the 5-h on/15-h off watchbill compared to all other watchbills, despite no statistically significant differences in daily sleep duration. The median SRI score was similar between fixed watchbills. The large measurable differences in SRI scores between watchbills, particularly when sleep duration was similar, demonstrated the value of sleep regularity assessment as a tool for evaluating watchbills.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelShift Work ScheduleSleepWork Schedule ToleranceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultmaritime defencesleep restrictionsleep timingsleep variabilitywatchkeeping

Identifiers

PMID40592708
PMCPMC12856107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.