ArticleAsian journal of andrology2026
Locally advanced prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in Asian journal of andrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real world outcomes of darolutamide activity and safety in treating hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Association between duration of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and prostate-specific antigen response and pathological outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent data from clinical trials have shown that neoadjuvant therapies significantly improve the pathological outcomes of prostate cancer patients. This study aimed to assess the specific pathological and prognostic effects of these therapies in a real-world, multicenter cohort. Additionally, we explored how factors such as the duration of neoadjuvant therapy and pretreatment imaging modality impact overall treatment outcomes within this therapeutic framework. Data were collected from 407 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC) who underwent radical prostatectomy following neoadjuvant therapy. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate the four primary clinical endpoints. The log-rank test was used to assess whether significant differences existed between patients grouped according to neoadjuvant therapy duration and pretreatment imaging modality. After a median follow-up period of 36 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 19 months. An analysis of different durations of neoadjuvant therapy revealed that compared with a 3-month regimen, a 6-month regimen was significantly associated with a greater extent of pathological downstaging and more favorable values for drug response indicators (Pearson test, P = 0.018). Additionally, the 6-month regimen significantly improved the clinical endpoints of PFS (log-rank test, P = 0.0075) and metastasis-free survival (MFS; log-rank test, P = 0.0069). Kaplan-Meier analysis of patients grouped according to preoperative imaging modality revealed that the use of 68 Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-directed positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT) before treatment, as opposed to traditional imaging, led to significant improvements in the clinical endpoints of PFS (log-rank test, P = 0.0059) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; log-rank test, P = 0.016).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.