Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40592355›Full record

ArticleChild: care, health and development2025

An Investigation Into Gross Motor Skill Intervention Provisions for Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder in the Republic of Ireland: Cross Sectional Study.

Mary Mannion, Kieran Dowd, Niamh Ni Cheilleachair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child: care, health and development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary MannionTechnological University of the Shannon, Athlone, Republic of Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9818-3025
Kieran DowdPhD Physical Education and Sports Science, SHE Research Group and the Dept. Sport and Health Sciences, Technological University of the Shannon, Athlone, Republic of Ireland.
Niamh Ni CheilleachairPhD Sports Science and Exercise Physiology, SHE Research Group and the Dept. Sport and Health Sciences, Technological University of the Shannon, Athlone, Republic of Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) often experience gross motor (GM) challenges. Left untreated, children may experience lasting physical, social and emotional repercussions. Limited information is available on the accessibility of GM-specific interventions.

objectivesThe study objectives were to identify, (1) past intervention experiences, (2) present provisions and needs and (3) barriers which may prevent children from receiving future GM intervention.

methodA modified Delphi technique was used for the online survey development. Parents of children with DCD were recruited through voluntary DCD support organisations, social media and existing participants. Frequency analysis was used for fixed response questions.

resultsCompleted by 237 parents of children with DCD, this survey represented 70.8% males (n = 168); 28.7% females (n = 68); 0.5% not specified (n = 1) with a median age of 10.0 (IQR = 3.0) and diagnosis age of 7.0 (IQR = 3.0). Referrals were to occupational therapists (OT) (63.5%) for activities of daily living (30.9%) and GM challenges (29.0%). Waiting lists were prevalent (76%) with 43.9% waiting longer than 12 months for intervention. Lengthy wait times for publicly funded intervention programs (61.0%) and cost-prohibitive private therapy (26.2%) were cited as the primary reasons for some not yet receiving GM skill intervention. Few parents are involved in the interventions (14.3%), yet most parents (98.6%) expressed a willingness to help.

conclusionGM dysfunction is a primary concern of DCD noted by parents and teachers, yet delayed diagnosis and lengthy waiting lists prohibit children from receiving timely and targeted GM intervention. Alternative methods of delivery with parental involvement should be considered to accommodate the vast numbers of children in need. SUMMARY: Occupational therapists (OTs) and teachers are identified as the top providers of motor skill intervention for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). Gross motor (GM) challenges are a primary concern for children with DCD, yet the treatment received likely prioritises activities of daily living (ADL) over GM difficulties. Targeted GM intervention is necessary but not often available due to lengthy waiting lists for publicly funded programmes and the high cost of private treatment. Although parents express a willingness to participate in the intervention process, their involvement is infrequently utilised. Collaborations between parents, teachers and therapists should be considered to make intervention more accessible and effective.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityMotor SkillsMotor Skills DisordersOccupational TherapyActivities of Daily LivingChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansIrelandMaleParentsdevelopmental coordination disorder (DCD)dyspraxiamotor skill interventionparental involvementphysical activity participation

Identifiers

PMID40592355
PMCPMC12212978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.