Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40592332›Full record

ReviewJournal of food and drug analysis2025

Regulatory framework and challenges for live biotherapeutic products in Taiwan.

Shirley Pan, Jia-Chuan Hsu, Kuo-Teng Hung, Ching-Jung Ho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of food and drug analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Microbial medicines: Unlocking the therapeutic potential of the microbiome in cancer treatment.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Pharmaceutics · 2026
    Review
  11. Decoding the power of the microbiome in human health.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shirley PanTaiwan Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jia-Chuan HsuTaiwan Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kuo-Teng HungTaiwan Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ching-Jung HoTaiwan Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Products containing live microorganisms may be classified as food or drugs depending on their intended use; live biotherapeutic products (LBPs) with therapeutic claims are defined as medicinal products containing live bacteria or yeasts intended to prevent or treat disease. Based on their characteristics, LBPs are classified as biological drugs and must be registered as biological drugs before they can enter the Taiwanese market. As research into the microbiota and its role in health and disease continues to advance, LBPs are expected to play an increasingly important role in medicine and biotechnology. With the growing popularity of microbial applications in recent years, there is still a lack of awareness regarding the management and regulation of such products. This article outlines the development, manufacturing, and marketing requirements of LBPs in Taiwan. After searching relevant literature, we summarized the regulations or related guidelines on LBPs from regulatory agencies such as the U.S. FDA, EMA, PMDA, and ICH. And compare the current requirements for LBPs in Taiwan. Key regulatory aspects of LBPs in Taiwan include definitions and classifications, quality and manufacturing requirements, clinical evidence, labeling and packaging information, post-marketing surveillance, etc. Regulations of LBPs in Taiwan align with international standards, but Taiwan authorities must be more inclusive in addressing new challenges facing LBPs innovation. This highlights the importance of continuous regulatory adaptation to foster innovation while ensuring safety and efficacy. Collaboration between regulatory bodies, industry stakeholders, and scientific communities will be essential to promoting innovation while maintaining robust regulatory oversight in the LBPs sector. In summary, while LBPs have significant therapeutic potential, addressing the regulatory challenges associated with their development, approval, and post-marketing surveillance is critical to ensure their safety, efficacy, and successful integration into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsBacteriaHumansTaiwanBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID40592332
PMCPMC12213168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.