Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40592302›Full record

ReviewKidney & blood pressure research2025

Predicting long-term kidney graft failure using novel multi-omic blood-based biomarkers and artificial intelligence tools.

Krzysztof Batko, Jolanta Małyszko, Anna Sączek, Katarzyna Sobczyńska, Jacek A Małyszko, Marcin Krzanowski, Marcelo Cantarovich, Katarzyna Krzanowska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney & blood pressure research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Krzysztof Batko
Jolanta Małyszko
Anna Sączek
Katarzyna Sobczyńska
Jacek A Małyszko
Marcin Krzanowski
Marcelo Cantarovich
Katarzyna Krzanowska

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney transplantation (KT) remains the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease. With advancements in immunosuppressive regimens and KT surveillance, graft survival has improved, though mainly in short-term. Meanwhile, aging populations with multimorbidity and expanding donor criteria shape a new landscape for KT management. Numerous prediction tools, including genomic, transcriptomic and/or proteomic panels or biomarkers, have been developed for short-to-interim outcomes, yet variable outcome definitions, modest samples and limited external replication preclude clinical utility. The temporal nature of association strength for graft failure risk factors reflects changes in underlying pathomechanisms and underscores the need for extensive validation. Chronic allograft rejection is a progressive process intertwined with variable T cell and antibody-mediated rejection patterns. On a molecular level, both innate and adaptive immune cells interface within the local graft microenvironment and release donor cell products (eg, exosomes, peptides, apoptotic bodies) that prime both T and B cell, but also IFNγ driven NK cell-mediated responses. Complement and Ig deposits along capillary lining lead to activated endothelium that promotes immune cell influx and aberrant differentiation patterns. Under cytokine and growth factor stimulation, mesenchymal transition of graft epithelial cells leads to altered extracellular turnover and TGFβ-mediated fibrosis. These mechanistic processes remain incompletely understood but represent a biologically plausible source for urine/blood biomarkers and omic profiling. Artifical intelligence and machine-learning tools provides a promise for elucidating the nature of these mechanisms due to their ability to capture non-linear trends and complex interactions. However, early efforts still remain unsatisfactory as the data demand increases, with concomitant requirements for high feature quality and sample representativeness.

Identifiers

PMID40592302
PMCPMC12503566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.