ArticleJournal of biomechanics2025
Examination of dynamic gait stability during overground walking in people with mild cognitive impairment.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recovery strategies during trip-like support surface perturbations while walking in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Cognitive Impairment Alters Cortical Adaptation and Gait Regulation During Obstacle Walking in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: Evidence From Temporal fNIRS and Gait Dynamics.Journal of movement disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is known to compromise balance in older adults, its influence on dynamic gait stability is less understood. This study is the first to examine dynamic gait stability within the Feasible Stability Region framework during level overground walking at a self-selected speed in individuals with MCI. Eighteen people with MCI (66.4 ± 5.9 years) and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (66.9 ± 6.2 years) completed overground walking trials at their comfortable speed while their full-body kinematics were collected. Dynamic gait stability at touchdown and liftoff served as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the center of mass velocity and position, along with standard spatiotemporal gait parameters. Dynamic gait stability was similar between groups at touchdown (p = 0.299) and liftoff (p = 0.185). However, people with MCI positioned their center of mass more anteriorly relative to the base of support than the healthy controls at touchdown (p < 0.001) and liftoff (p = 0.012). The center of mass velocity was slower in the MCI group than in cognitively healthy individuals at touchdown (p = 0.013) and comparable between groups at liftoff (p = 0.109). People with MCI exhibited a reduced gait speed (p = 0.018), decreased cadence (p = 0.018), shortened step length (p = 0.047), and prolonged stance phase (p = 0.067) compared to their healthy counterparts. Our study suggests that older adults with MCI adopt a cautious gait pattern, allowing them to maintain dynamic gait stability. These findings provide insight into the dynamic stability control in people with MCI during gait, broadening our understanding of dynamic balance control in human locomotion across populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.