ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025
Charting a path forward toward integrating macrolevel phenomena, marginalization, and health equity principles in into dissemination and implementation science.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a co-designed community-based physical activity program with immigrant South Asian older women: an intersectional RE-AIM/PRISM analysis of acceptability and feasibility.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- How power is conceptualized and operationalized in evidence-based intervention implementation: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dissemination and implementation (D&I) science is ascendant within public health in the United States, but D&I scientists have long voiced concern at their field's capacity to fulfill two essential and intertwined public health responsibilities: analyzing and intervening in macrosocial determinants and achieving health equity. To help break this impasse, we explore D&I's theoretical roots by critically reviewing three historical eras, eras that D&I's origin story has identified as foundational to D&I's development: 1890-1903: Tarde's Laws of Imitation. 1920-1960: Rural Sociology. 1960-1980: Knowledge Utilization Research. Our racism-conscious disciplinary self-critique reveals that, as elsewhere in public health, D&I became ascendant in part by developing an "epistemology of ignorance" that has acted in service to racial capitalism - that is, D&I has developed a structured way of (not) knowing that systematically suppresses evidence about racial capitalism and its consequences. Each of D&I's foundational eras was characterized by marked transitions in racial capitalism, in which macrosocial phenomena produced novel forms of marginalization that in turn engendered mass resistance (e.g., industrialization and imperialism; farming crises). In response, D&I's forebears crafted explanatory frameworks (e.g., Diffusion of Innovation) that obscured these transformational macrosocial phenomena, reinforced the marginalizations that they produced, and diverted attention toward atomistic individual-level phenomena. These frameworks have helped foster an epistemology of ignorance within D&I about macrosocial phenomena, marginalization, and health inequities that persists to this day. We propose that D&I has an opportunity to forge another era now in which it partners with critical social scientists, practitioners, activists, and people with lived experience to bring macrosocial phenomena, marginalization, and health inequities more firmly into its orbit. We close with principles to guide the development of this era that are rooted in learnings from D&I's history and Public Health Critical Race Praxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.