Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40591700›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Understanding the interaction of upper respiratory tract infection with respiratory syncytial virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae using a human challenge model: a multicenter, randomized controlled study protocol.

Sanjita Brito-Mutunayagam, David O Hamilton, Elena Mitsi, Carla Solórzano, Grace Li, Bruno Rocha De Macedo, Filora Elterish, Xinxue Liu, Kiarash Tanha, Rachel White and 21 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Sanjita Brito-MutunayagamOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-3715-2493
David O HamiltonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Elena MitsiOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Carla SolórzanoOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Grace LiOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Bruno Rocha De MacedoOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Filora ElterishOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Xinxue LiuOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kiarash TanhaOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rachel WhiteOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Angela Hyder-WrightDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Bhumika PatelOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Britta C UrbanOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Conor WhelanOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Hanane Trari BelhadefOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Hannah RobinsonOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Emma PlestedOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Amber ThompsonOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Maria LahuertaPfizer Vaccines, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, United States of America.
Isis KanevskyPfizer Vaccines, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, United States of America.
Kena SwansonPfizer Vaccines, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, United States of America.
Negar AliabadiPfizer Vaccines, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, United States of America.
Julie CatussePfizer Vaccines, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, United States of America.
Christian TheilackerPfizer Vaccines, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, United States of America.
Bradford D GessnerPfizer Vaccines, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, United States of America.
Natalie I MazurDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Christopher ChiuDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrea M CollinsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Ben MortonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6164-2854
Maheshi N RamasamyOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Daniela M FerreiraOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStreptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are major causes of respiratory infections globally. Viral and bacterial co-infections are commonly observed in respiratory infections and there is evidence that these pathogens interact synergistically to evade host responses and lead to more severe disease. Notably, RSV seasonal outbreaks are associated with increased hospitalization and a subsequent peak in invasive pneumococcal disease cases, particularly in pediatric populations. Here, we summarize a protocol for a controlled human infection model aiming to evaluate pathogen interaction dynamics and immune responses in a combined pneumococcus and RSV model. The primary objective is to determine whether primary RSV challenge increases the risk of secondary pneumococcal colonization.

methodsThis is an open-label, multi-center, randomized controlled human co-infection study, inclusive of a pilot phase. Individuals will be randomized to primary inoculation with either pneumococcus (serotype 6B) or RSV (subtype RSV-A) intra-nasally on day 0 followed by a reciprocal challenge on day 7. During pilot phase A up to 10 participants will be monitored in an in-patient facility for 7-10 days following RSV-A challenge. If there are no safety concerns, we will then progress to an outpatient phase where participants will self-isolate at home. Clinical samples to be taken from participants include nasal swabs and washes for pathogen detection; and nasal cells, nasal lining fluid, and blood samples to examine mucosal and systemic immune responses. DISCUSSION: This work will lead to important scientific knowledge on the interaction and dynamics between pneumococcus and RSV. This knowledge could help inform pneumococcal and RSV vaccination strategies, particularly for groups at risk of developing severe pneumococcal and RSV disease.

trial registrationThe study is registered on ISRCTN (The UKs Clinical Study Registry). DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12036902.

Indexed as

CoinfectionPneumococcal InfectionsRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsRespiratory Tract InfectionsFemaleHumansInfantMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Syncytial VirusesRespiratory Syncytial Virus, HumanStreptococcus pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID40591700
PMCPMC12212582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.