Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40591691›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Structural impact of synonymous mutations in six SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern.

Alison Ziesel, Hosna Jabbari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alison ZieselDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2333-5028
Hosna JabbariDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 continues to spread and infect people worldwide. While most effort into characterizing variants of this virus have focused on non-synonymous changes, accumulation of synonymous mutations in different viral variants has also occurred. Here we characterize six Variants of Concern in terms of their mutational content, and make predictions regarding the impact of those mutations on potential genomic RNA secondary structure and stability. Our hypothesis is that if non-protein changing, yet RNA structure-changing mutations impact viral fitness by imposing deleterious change to predicted RNA structure, we would expect to those mutations to be less abundant, while if those synonymous mutations do not impact viral fitness through influence of RNA structure, we would see them more frequently than non-synonymous mutations. We find that synonymous mutations typically have no or modest impact to RNA secondary structure. As synonymous mutations are free from the selective pressure imposed on protein-altering mutations, the impact of synonymous mutations is largely limited to RNA secondary structure considerations. The absence of major, structure-altering synonymous mutations emphasize the importance of RNA structure, including within coding regions, to viral fitness. Synonymous mutations should be included in the characterization of emerging RNA viruses as these mutations may confer effects to viral fitness via RNA secondary structural modifications.

Indexed as

COVID-19RNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Silent MutationGenome, ViralHumansMutationNucleic Acid ConformationRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID40591691
PMCPMC12212874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.