ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Legal status disparities in preventive care usage among Latino immigrants in California: A cross-sectional analysis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Continuity of Care at the Edges of America: Rethinking Health for Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Workers in the U.S. Midwest.Journal of community health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper examines disparities in preventive care utilization among Latino immigrants, differentiating between naturalized U.S. citizens, permanent residents, temporary status holders, and undocumented immigrants. We analyzed data from the 2015-2016 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), a cross-sectional, representative sample of California residents. Our sample consisted of 5,513 respondents who self-identified as foreign-born Latinos. We examined three measures of preventive health: annual checkups, flu vaccinations, and access to mammogram screenings. We applied weighted logistic regression to estimate how immigrants' odds of receiving annual checkups and flu vaccinations in the past year, and mammogram screenings in the past two years, differed by legal status after controlling for various sociodemographic and health factors. We found that naturalized citizens and lawful permanent residents (LPRs) report higher unadjusted odds of having annual checkups (citizen OR = 3.23, p = 0.000; LPR OR = 2.03, p = 0.000), flu vaccines (citizen OR = 2.14, p = 0.000; LPR OR = 1.62, p = 0.000), and mammograms (citizen OR = 3.24, p = 0.000; LPR OR = 1.95, p = 0.005) relative to undocumented immigrants. However, immigrants with temporary legal status do not differ significantly in their rate of preventive care utilization relative to those who are undocumented. This suggests that precarious legal status, rather than outright undocumented status alone, contributes to disparities in preventive care. After controlling for sociodemographic, health status, and health access factors, legal status disparities in flu vaccinations lose statistical significance, while naturalized citizens continue to have higher odds of annual checkups (OR = 1.46, p = 0.032) and mammograms (OR = 2.69, p = 0.000) and permanent residents remain more likely to receive mammograms (OR = 1.68, p = 0.05) relative to undocumented immigrants. Our findings underscore the need to address access to and utilization of preventive care among legally vulnerable immigrants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.