Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40591665›Full record

ArticleEFORT open reviews2025

5% benzoyl peroxide is the most efficient in reducing the cutibacterium flora of the shoulder skin: a network meta-analysis.

Viktor Weninger, Gergely Agócs, Luca Hergár, Szilárd Váncsa, Bence Hegedűs, Imre Szerb, Péter Hegyi, Gábor Skaliczki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFORT open reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Preoperative benzoyl peroxide 5% reduces early Cutibacterium acnes-related postoperative spinal implant infections: a quasi-experimental study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gergely Agócs
Luca Hergár
Bence Hegedűs
Imre Szerb
Péter Hegyi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Our study aims to compare different perioperative treatments to reduce C. acnes, the most common causative agent of surgical site infections following shoulder surgery. Methods: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and the Web of Science for studies published up to October 20, 2022. We included randomized-controlled trails investigating the efficacy of different dermal preparation in reducing the C. acnes colonising the skin surface. The studies examined positive bacterial cultures before and after skin treatment. The included trials were able to compare seven different skin treatment methods. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis and calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Our study could include comparisons of 946 different patients. The use of 5% benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and its combination with the antibiotic clindamycin was found to be the most effective in reducing C. acnes colonization on the skin (BPO 5% RR = 0.25, CI: 0.08-0.72, BPO with clindamycin RR = 0.25, CI: 0.04-1.50). Based on the rank plot, 5% BPO (P score: 0.808) was the most effective treatment, followed by BPO 5% with clindamycin (P score: 0.749). We could not perform a network meta-analysis regarding the efficacy of different dermal preparation in reducing C. acnes colonization on the dermis and in the joint. Conclusion: Cutibacterium colonization of the skin flora can be effectively reduced on the skin surface by the use of 5% BPO.

Indexed as

benzoilC. acnesCutibacteriumhydrogen peroxideinfectioninfection controlperoxidepropionibacterium

Identifiers

PMID40591665
PMCPMC12232397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.