ArticlePloS one2025
Identification of digital clinical decision support systems for supporting diagnosis and triage of patients with shoulder disorders: A scoping review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are computerized tools that support clinical decision-making processes. Primary care decision-making is complex and has the potential to influence quality of care provided and patient outcomes. CDSS not only assist providers with clinical decision-making to ensure quality standards are met, reflect evidence-informed practice, and reduce variation in care, but also help patients navigate and receive an appropriate care pathway amidst numerous, often complex, options. Therefore, this scoping review will aim to identify existing CDSSs for supporting primary point-of-care providers, directing patients to appropriate management pathways, and supporting the clinical examination (i.e., medical history-taking and physical examination) process for patients with shoulder disorders. At the primary point-of-care system level, a CDSS for shoulder disorders will improve clinical efficiency and support decision-making.
methodsScoping review methodology and reporting will be conducted according to Arksey and O'Malley's 6-step framework, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P), and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting guide. A robust search strategy will be applied across four databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), and Scopus (Elsevier). Two blinded reviewers will independently evaluate all titles and corresponding abstracts based on pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) agreement will be established during an initial pilot-screening phase against a random selection of 20 records (minimum) until reaching Cohen's Kappa ≥ 0.81. Data extraction will be completed by one reviewer and validated by a second. DISCUSSION: An effective and high-quality CDSS that is affordable, easy to use, easily accessible, compatible with existing clinical processes, and generalizable across diverse settings will help to support primary point-of-care providers in diagnosing and managing patients presenting with shoulder disorders, thus improving quality of care for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.