ArticlePloS one2025
A test method for selecting suitable cleaning indicators for routine cleaning monitoring on a washer-disinfector in a central sterile supply department.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cleaning indicators are widely used to evaluate the efficacy of cleaning processes in automated washer-disinfectors (AWDs) in healthcare settings. In this study, we systematically analyzed the performance of commercial indicators across multiple simulated cleaning protocols to guide the correct selection of suitable cleaning indicators in Central Sterile Supply Departments (CSSD). Eleven commercially available cleaning indicators were tested in five cleaning simulations, P0 to P4, where P1 represented the standard cleaning process in CSSD, while P2-P4 incorporated induced-error cleaning processes to mimic real-world errors. All indicators were uniformly positioned at the top level of the cleaning rack to ensure comparable exposure. Key parameters, including indicator response dynamics (e.g., wash-off sequence) and final residue results, were documented throughout the cleaning cycles. The final wash-off results given by the indicators under P0, in which no detergent was injected, were much worse than those of the other four processes. Under different simulations, the final results of the indicators and their wash-off sequences changed substantially. In conclusion, an effective indicator must be selected experimentally. The last indicator to be washed off during the normal cleaning process that can simultaneously clearly show the presence of dirt residue under induced error conditions is the optimal indicator for monitoring cleaning processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.