ReviewEFORT open reviews2025
Imaging and classifications of atlantoaxial dislocation: a narrative review.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anxiety- and depression-related somatic symptoms and atlantoaxial disorders: potential mechanistic links and clinical implications.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiography is of importance in the diagnosis of atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD), and it is the basic imaging technique. However, it should not be the sole diagnostic modality, especially in complex or unclear cases. Conventional X-ray includes an open-mouth odontoid view and a cross-table lateral view, and careful study of radiological findings is crucial to give an early diagnosis of AAD. Lateral flexion-extension dynamic views are only used as an additional supplement in some special cases. Although X-ray images are enough to diagnose AAD in most cases, some patients suspected with AAD should be evaluated with the readily available and quick CT scan. If patients with AAD have symptoms of spinal cord and medullary compression, apart from conventional radiographs, a combination of high-quality CT and MRI of cervical spine are necessary for the diagnosis and choice of treatment. For patients with AAD, both the thin slice CT scanning with coronal, sagittal and three-dimensional reconstruction images and MRI of cervical spine are fundamental to surgical planning. Clinical classifications of AAD associated with imaging are useful in determining treatment strategies. The present study reviews publications on imaging and clinical classification of AAD to aid the clinician in the evaluation and management of these dislocations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.