Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40591637›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2025

Imaging and classifications of atlantoaxial dislocation: a narrative review.

Guangzhou Li, Hao Zhang, Qing Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiography is of importance in the diagnosis of atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD), and it is the basic imaging technique. However, it should not be the sole diagnostic modality, especially in complex or unclear cases. Conventional X-ray includes an open-mouth odontoid view and a cross-table lateral view, and careful study of radiological findings is crucial to give an early diagnosis of AAD. Lateral flexion-extension dynamic views are only used as an additional supplement in some special cases. Although X-ray images are enough to diagnose AAD in most cases, some patients suspected with AAD should be evaluated with the readily available and quick CT scan. If patients with AAD have symptoms of spinal cord and medullary compression, apart from conventional radiographs, a combination of high-quality CT and MRI of cervical spine are necessary for the diagnosis and choice of treatment. For patients with AAD, both the thin slice CT scanning with coronal, sagittal and three-dimensional reconstruction images and MRI of cervical spine are fundamental to surgical planning. Clinical classifications of AAD associated with imaging are useful in determining treatment strategies. The present study reviews publications on imaging and clinical classification of AAD to aid the clinician in the evaluation and management of these dislocations.

Indexed as

atlantoaxial dislocationcervical spineclassificationsimaging

Identifiers

PMID40591637
PMCPMC12232392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.