ArticlePloS one2025
Mixed-methods study to assess delay among patients with tuberculosis in an urban setting of Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Correction: Mixed-methods study to assess delay among patients with tuberculosis in an urban setting of Bangladesh.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis (TB) regained its position as the leading cause of death globally from a single infectious disease agent in 2024. Delayed diagnosis and treatment hamper effective TB control. We investigated the duration of diagnostic and treatment delay along with the associated factors among people with pulmonary TB in Bangladesh.
methodsA mixed-method study was conducted between December'19 and March'21, at icddr,b TB Screening and Treatment Centres (TBSTCs), Dhaka. We interviewed people with TB (PWTB) seeking care at these TBSTCs using a structured questionnaire to collect data on socio-demographic, clinical and healthcare seeking behaviors. We used established frameworks to define stages of delay and associated factors. Qualitative interviews were conducted among a subset of participants to gain further insight into the factors associated with delay.
resultsWe enrolled 895 PWTB with mean (±SD) age 36.6 (±16.1) years; majority of participants were males (69.9%) and living in urban areas (82.3%). The median (IQR) patient delay estimated was 47 (29-72) days, with diagnostic delay 45 (30-70) days and treatment delay 2 (2-4) days. The predictors of delay were those with diabetes (OR 2.0, 95% CI - 1.11, 3.42), who initially self-treated (OR 2.1, 95% CI - 1.09, 3.88), and were bacteriologically diagnosed (OR 3.7, 95% CI - 1.31, 10.46). Qualitative approach supported the quantitative findings and revealed the practice of visiting formal physicians during worsening illness, neglecting to acknowledge signs or symptoms consistent with TB, lack of TB related knowledge, and financial insolvency as major reasons for delay.
conclusionOur findings showed that improper health-seeking behavior is one of the major drivers of patient delay. Thus, targeted programmatic intervention to raise community awareness on TB and its care services with a special focus on informal providers can help reduce this delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.