ArticlePloS one2025
Bubble-Wall Plot as a Dynamic Analytical Processing Visualization Tool for Developing Visual Warning Systems: a Case Study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a dynamic analytical processing (DAP) visualization tool based on the Bubble-Wall Plot. It can be handily used to develop visual warning systems for visualizing the dynamic analytical processes of hazard data. Comparative analysis and case study methods are used in this research. Based on a literature review of Q1 publications since 2017, 23 types of data visualization approaches/tools are identified, including seven anomaly data visualization tools. This study presents three significant findings by comparing existing data visualization approaches. The primary finding is that no single visualization tool can fully satisfy industry requirements. This finding motivates academics to develop new DAP visualization tools. The second finding is that there are different views of Line Charts and various perspectives on Scatter Plots. The other one is that different researchers may perceive an existing data visualization tool differently, such as arguments between Scatter Plots and Line Charts and diverse opinions about Parallel Coordinate Plots and Scatter Plots. Users' awareness rises when they choose data visualization tools that satisfy their requirements. By conducting a comparative analysis based on five categories (Style, Value, Change, Correlation, and Others) with 26 subcategories of metric features, results show that this new tool can effectively solve the limitations of existing visualization tools as it appears to have three remarkable characteristics: the simplest cartographic tool, the most straightforward visual result, and the most intuitive tool. Furthermore, this paper illustrates how the Bubble-Wall Plot can be effectively applied to develop a warning system for presenting dynamic analytical processes of hazard data in the coal mine. Lastly, this paper provides two recommendations, one implication, six research limitations, and eleven further study topics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.