ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2025
Associations Between Patients' Primary Spoken Language and Perioperative Outcomes After Hip Fracture.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecently, the role of a patient's primary spoken language (PSL) has emerged as a potential contributor to perioperative outcomes. This study aimed to identify the association between a patient's PSL and hip fracture perioperative outcomes, including hospital length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, nonhome discharge, 30-day emergency department visits, 90-day readmissions, and 90-day complications.
methodsAn institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study was performed using institutional data. Two cohorts were created for patients who underwent either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or arthroplasty (total or hemiarthroplasty) for a hip fracture in 2016 to 2023 in a multihospital academic health system. Within each cohort, patients with non-English and English PSL were matched 1:3 based on age, sex, insurance, American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification, dementia, and obesity. Generalized linear models measured associations between PSL and outcomes, adjusting for Charlson Comorbidity Index; adjusted odds ratios are reported for binary outcomes and adjusted mean differences are reported for continuous outcomes.
resultsThe matched cohorts included 729 patients undergoing ORIF and 473 undergoing arthroplasty. In multivariable analyses in the ORIF cohort, non-English PSL (versus English) was associated with a markedly longer LOS by an average of 0.95 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 1.62, P = 0.01) and decreased likelihood of discharge to a nonhome setting (odds ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval, 0.39 to 0.98, P = 0.04). For arthroplasty, non-English PSL (versus English) was markedly associated with shorter LOS by an average of 1.04 days (95% CI, -1.99 to -0.09, P = 0.03). No notable associations were identified between PSL and the other outcomes.
conclusionThese findings suggest language-based differences in perioperative outcomes for surgical management of hip fracture. Further research is needed to identify the mechanisms of these associations and evaluate the clinical significance on long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.