ArticlePloS one2025
Far-red LED light alters circadian rhythms and elicits dark-adapted ERG responses in rodents.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diurnal behavioral outcomes and BBB integrity in adult male SHR and WKY rats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rodents are assumed to be blind to red light, thus red light is often used in the dark phase of a light/dark cycle to facilitate study procedures using nocturnal rodents. However, effects of red light in dark phase on behaviors and circadian rhythms in rodents are not yet clear. Thus, we evaluated effects of various long wavelength red light-emitting diode (LED) light on circadian rhythm and electroretinogram (ERG) in C57BL/6J mice and Wistar Han rats. Animals were implanted with telemetry devices to measure body temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, and locomotor activity for circadian rhythm assessment. In contrary to infra-red light, all visible long wavelength red lights, including the far-red LED light with a peak at 741 nm, induced significant alterations in circadian rhythms and dark-adapted rod photoreceptor-mediated ERG responses in mice and/or rats. However, far-red light did not elicit light-adapted cone photoreceptor-mediated ERG responses in both mice and rats. These findings demonstrate that rodents can perceive all spectrum of long wavelength red lights that are visible to humans, and exposures of red lights in dark phase interfere with their circadian rhythms. A dim far-red LED with peak wavelength in the range of 740-760 nm is recommended to use in the dark phase of a rodent room, and potential impacts are considered when using red light >2 photopic lux.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.