ArticlePloS one2025
Usability of machine learning algorithms based on electronic health records for the prediction of acute kidney injury and transition to acute kidney disease: A proof of concept study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting acute kidney injury in septic shock patients using inflammatory indices in the intensive care unit.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Serum uric acid variability and short-term mortality in chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cohort study with independent replication in MIMIC-IV.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Current and Future Applications of AI-Driven Predictive Modeling and a Proposed Framework for AI-Bioprognostics in Kidney Care.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and the future of clinical trials.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) and acute kidney disease (AKD) are frequent complications of hospitalization, resulting in reduced outcomes and increased cost burden. However, these conditions are only sometimes recognized and promptly treated. Leveraging electronic health records (EHR), we explored the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing AKI and AKD during hospitalization.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed EHRs collected from all patients admitted in 2022 to our public hospital network. AKI and AKD were defined according to international guidelines. The database was divided into training and validation sets. Machine Learning (ML) algorithms were developed with 10-fold cross-validation, and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated.
findingsWe analyzed 34,579 hospitalizations (mean age of 60 years, 50% females). Baseline renal function was available in ~50% of cases. AKI and AKD complicated 10% and 1.5% of hospitalizations, respectively. The majority of AKI episodes (77%) occurred within the first three days of hospitalization, and >50% of subjects with AKI were discharged before complete renal function recovery. ML accurately predicted AKI (AUC-ROC 79%) during hospitalization, based on data available before and at hospital admission. Among subjects with AKI on the first day and longer in-hospital observation, the ML accuracy in predicting AKD transition increased (AUC-ROC from 76% to 88%) by integrating EHR accumulated during the hospitalization. The negative predictive value (NPV) progressively increased from 94% to 98% consistently. Shapely additive explanations documented that age, urgent hospital admission, AKI severity, and baseline renal function were associated with AKI. Renal function trajectory during the first days of hospitalization was the most relevant predictor of AKD.
interpretationML, relying on EHR before and during hospitalization, may accurately predict AKI and AKD. The high NPV also suggests its implementation as a tool to rule out the risk of renal failure, aid in individualizing patient care, and allocate healthcare resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.