ArticlePloS one2025
Scientific and technological innovation cooperation network of the Greater Bay Area in South China: A social network analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Who gets connected? Open government data and access to intercity innovation networks.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regional innovation cooperation focused upon either regions within one nation or transnational regions. Different from the discussion in the existing literature, the Guangdong- Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area exists as an exceptional cross-border city-to-city cooperation under "one country, two systems". Based on the social network analysis on co- patents in the Greater Bay Area, this paper aims to investigate the models and features of the innovation cooperation network of science and technology in the Greater Bay Area and the different characteristics of collaboration policy on cross-border knowledge flow before and after 2015. The results show that the innovation network of science and technology in the Greater Bay Area has a loosely structured pattern, with Hong Kong-Shenzhen-Guangzhou as a prominent hub. This structure portrays multiple centers that radiate out to its peripheries. The national policy launched in 2015 reduces the cooperation barriers and promotes the cross-border collaboration. The universities and research institutes possess significant intermediary roles and innovation autonomy in the scientific and technological innovation cooperation network of the Greater Bay Area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.