Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40591550›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Masked face matching benefits from isolated facial features.

Mengying Zhang, Melanie Sauerland, Anna Sagana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Masked and elusive: congruency fails in video-to-photo face matching.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mengying ZhangSection Forensic Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3382-4538
Melanie SauerlandSection Forensic Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7401-1365
Anna SaganaSection Forensic Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Verifying the identity of an unfamiliar person is a difficult task, especially when targets wear masks that cover most of their faces. This presents a major challenge for law enforcement in border control, security, and criminal investigations. Therefore, we aim to explore ways to improve face-matching performance when a face is heavily masked. In two experiments, we investigated whether face-matching performance can benefit from the presentation of isolated facial features, namely the eyes (Experiment 1) and the mouth (Experiment 2), when a target face is masked. Participants viewed pairs of faces and determined whether they belonged to the same person or different people. In congruent pairs, participants matched a full-face image to another full-face image or a masked image to an isolated facial feature. In incongruent pairs, participants matched a full-face image to an image of the eyes or the mouth only or to a masked image. Matching accuracy was significantly better in congruent than incongruent pairs. Interestingly, the benefit of showing an isolated facial feature was even present when that single feature was the mouth. Overall, the findings showed that focusing on isolated facial features, such as the eyes or mouth, can be a valuable strategy for enhancing identity matching with masked perpetrators.

Indexed as

FaceFacial RecognitionPerceptual MaskingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMouthYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40591550
PMCPMC12212515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.