RevieweLife2025
Current insights into insect immune memory.
Review in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rickettsial Diseases and Vaccines: Is There an Opportunity for Plant-Made Vaccine Technology?Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Review
- Beyond silkworms: translating molecular mechanisms of pesticide toxicity from Bombyx mori to lepidopteran pest management.Pest management science · 2026Review
- Epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming of innate immune cells establishes immunological memory in the Schistosomiasis vector snail Biomphalaria glabrata.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Locust cGAS-like Receptors Recognize Derivatives of a Gypsy Retrotransposon to Synergize with RNAi Against Viral Invasion.Insects · 2026Article
- Recent insights in the development and functions of insect hemocytes.Current opinion in insect science · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditionally, insects have been thought to be entirely dependent on their innate immune system, which has little capacity for the acquisition of experience from previous infections. However, much experimental evidence has challenged this view, showing that insects can develop long-term, pathogen-specific immune memory, which in some cases can be transmitted to offspring. Although significant progress has been made in this area, the underlying mechanism is still not fully understood, and a number of fundamental questions remain unanswered. In this review, we present an overview of documented cases of insect immune memory and summarize the experimental evidence in support of the prevailing hypotheses on the mechanism of antiviral and antibacterial immune memory in insects. We also highlight key questions that remain unanswered and discuss
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.