Trial reportJAMA network open2025
A Prescribed Digital Health App and Number of Migraine Days: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engagement and predictors of use of a smartphone app for migraine self-management: A secondary analysis of the EMMA trial.Headache · 2026Trial
- Gender, headache frequency, and headache intensity predict psychosocial functioning and quality of life in a sample of United States combat veterans.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- The Analytical Framework of Clinical Trials Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Artificial Intelligence-Based Digital Health Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of market access & health policy · 2026Review
- The Therapeutic Home Environment for Chronic Diseases: A Transdisciplinary Ecosystem for Achieving Migraine Freedom and Managing Comorbid Anxiety, Insomnia, and Chronic Pain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Migraine care in the digital era: social listening insights and neurologists' perspectives from Türkiye.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The digital therapeutics market is expanding rapidly, with growing patient adoption. In some countries, digital health applications are already prescribable, reshaping clinical practice. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the prescribable digital health app used in this study with a control app in reducing the number of migraine days among adults diagnosed with migraine. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted remotely across Germany from March to December 2021. Adults (≥18 years of age) with episodic or chronic migraine were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention (n = 238) using a prescribable digital health app, called M-sense Migräne, or to the control (n = 239) group. Data were analyzed from February to March 2022. Intervention: The intervention group used the full version of the prescribable digital health app, while the control group used an app version limited to headache diary features. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of migraine days per a 28-day month after 12 weeks of using the app (assessed weeks 9-12), analyzed using analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline migraine days and migraine type. Secondary outcomes included the number of headache days per month, quality of life (assessed with the 6-item Headache Impact Test), self-efficacy (assessed with the Headache Management Self-Efficacy Scale German Short Form), Headache-Attributed Lost Time in the previous 30 days (HALT-30), migraine-specific health literacy, and days with acute headache medication use. Results: Of 477 randomized participants, 476 were included in the intention-to-treat population (intervention, n = 238; control, n = 238). The participants' overall mean (SD) age was 35.2 (10.4) years, 429 were female (90.1%); and the mean (SD) migraine history was 17.42 (10.49) years. After 12 weeks, there was no significant difference in the number of migraine days per month between groups. Migraine days per month decreased from a mean (SD) of 7.74 (3.70) to an adjusted mean of 5.79 (95% CI, 5.02-6.57) in the intervention group and from a mean (SD) of 7.76 (3.69) to an adjusted mean of 5.41 (95% CI, 4.63-6.19) in the control group, with an estimated between-group difference of 0.38 days (95% CI, -0.32 to 1.08 days; P = .29). There were no group differences for most secondary outcomes. No serious adverse reactions were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the prescribed digital migraine health app did not show superiority in reducing migraine days compared with a control app having only basic headache documentation features. This finding underscores the need for randomized clinical trials as a cornerstone of a robust evaluation framework, ensuring both treatment efficacy and patient safety in an expanding digital therapeutics market. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) identifier: DRKS00024174.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.