Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40591356›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Video Streaming or Telephone Communication During Emergency Medical Services Dispatch Calls: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Martin Faurholdt Gude, Jan Brink Valentin, Milena Meisner-Jensen, Natascha Hougaard Bohnstedt-Pedersen, Anne Kathrine Dalgaard, Ulla Væggemose, Rolf Ankerlund Blauenfeldt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05742412 (Criteria-based Ambulance Management - Video Indexation VS Standard Indexation On Non-selected Emergency Calls), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05742412 nacompletednot on this map

Criteria-based Ambulance Management - Video Indexation VS Standard Indexation On Non-selected Emergency Calls

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Denmark RegionRan2023 to 2023Enrolled20,539ConditionsEmergency Medical Dispatch Centre, Video Streaming, Emergency Call, Prehospital Emergency Medical ServicesArmsVideo streaming (smartphone camera), Telephone (telephone microphone)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. LiVE-STROKE: live video from bystander to the medical dispatcher in potential stroke cases.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Cluster-Randomized Trials in Emergency Care Research.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martin Faurholdt GudeDepartment of Research & Development, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.
Jan Brink ValentinDanish Center for Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Milena Meisner-JensenDepartment of Research & Development, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.
Natascha Hougaard Bohnstedt-PedersenDepartment of Research & Development, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.
Anne Kathrine DalgaardDepartment of Research & Development, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.
Ulla VæggemoseDepartment of Research & Development, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.
Rolf Ankerlund BlauenfeldtDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Video streaming during emergency medical calls may enhance triage precision and optimize health resource allocation. However, its clinical safety and effect on key outcomes remain unexplored in randomized clinical trials. Objective: To assess whether video streaming during emergency calls reduces highest-urgency ambulance dispatches while ensuring safety through outcomes such as 24-hour hospital admissions among initially nonconveyed patients, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted across 4 months (January 1 through April 30, 2023) at a single emergency medical dispatch center serving 1.3 million residents in the Central Denmark Region. Matched pairs of dispatchers were randomized to manage calls using either telephone only communication (control) or video streaming (intervention). Calls were routed to the next available dispatcher who had been idle the longest. Data were analyzed using the intention-to-treat approach. Intervention: Dispatchers in the intervention group used secure, 1-way smartphone video streaming during emergency calls, while the control group followed standard telephone protocols. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the percentage of ambulances dispatched at the highest urgency level. Secondary outcomes included 24-hour hospital admissions among initially nonconveyed patients, ICU admission, mortality rates, and dispatch call duration. Results: Of 18 745 calls (patient median [IQR] age, 57 [31-76] years; 54.4% female), 8124 were received by 10 dispatchers randomized to video streaming and 10 621 by 10 dispatchers randomized to telephone-only communication. Video streaming was established in 3706 of the 8124 calls (45.6% [95% CI, 44.6%-46.7%]). Compared with the control group, the intervention group demonstrated a 5.0% absolute reduction (95% CI, 0.0%-10.1%; P = .049) in highest-urgency ambulance dispatches and no significant change (4.5% increase [95% CI, -1.1% to 10.0%; P = .11]) in nonconveyance. Hospital admissions among initially nonconveyed patients within 24 hours were reduced by 2.0% (95% CI, -3.7% to -0.2%; P = .03). Mean dispatch time was 3.7 minutes (95% CI, 3.4-4.0 minutes) in the video streaming group vs 3.2 minutes (95% CI, 2.9-3.4 minutes) in the telephone-only group, a difference of 0.5 minutes (95% CI, 0.1-0.9 minutes; P = .02). Mortality rates at 30 days and ICU admission rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cluster randomized clinical trial assessing high-stakes emergency calls, video streaming reduced the frequency of highest-urgency ambulance dispatches and lowered hospital admissions among initially nonconveyed patients, but slightly increased dispatch times. These findings suggest that video streaming may improve triage accuracy and reduce hospital and prehospital resource use. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05742412.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical DispatchEmergency Medical Service Communication SystemsEmergency Medical ServicesTelephoneVideo RecordingAdultAgedAmbulancesDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTriage

Identifiers

PMID40591356
PMCPMC12215568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.