Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40591223›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2025

Early Effects of Communities That Care on the Adoption and Implementation Fidelity of Evidence-Based Prevention Programs in Communities: Results from a Quasi-experimental Study.

L Decker, I von Holt, S Ünlü, U Walter, D Röding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Early Effects of Communities That Care on System Transformation: a Non-randomized Community Trial in Germany.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L DeckerHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. decker.lea@mh-hannover.de.ORCID 0009-0009-2983-7051
I von HoltHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
S ÜnlüHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
U WalterHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
D RödingHannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EL2006BDeutsches Forum für Kriminalprävention 01EL2006A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, few evidence-based prevention programs (EBP) have been implemented in Germany, despite their growing availability. Some prevention researchers have stated that prevention support systems such as Communities That Care (CTC) could contribute to the wider spread of EBP in Germany and improve the fidelity of EBP implementation. Our study aims to investigate whether CTC leads to greater adoption of EBP in German communities. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 22 intervention communities (IC) and 22 comparison communities (CC). Data collection occurred at two time points (T0: 2021/2022 and T1: 2023/2024), capturing information on which EBP were implemented in these communities during the prior school year, the number of people reached, and the quality of EBP implementation. Data from 17 IC and 12 CC were included in the final analyses. At T0, there were no significant differences between IC and CC in the number of EBP implemented or the number of people reached. In the IC, the average number of EBP implemented was 3.57 per 10,000 residents at T0, which increased significantly to 8.57 at T1 (p = .004). In the CC, the average number rose from 1.88 at T0 to 3.41 at T1, though this change was not statistically significant (p = .089). Regarding reach, an average of 140 people per 10,000 residents were reached with EBP at T0 in IC, increasing to 407 by T1, while in CC, the average increased from 77 at T0 to 300 at T1. Neither group showed a statistically significant increase in reach. Implementation fidelity remained consistently high in both groups at both time points. The results suggest that CTC may encourage communities to implement more EBP. However, the findings may be influenced by confounding factors and the relatively short observation period. Further research with an extended follow-up is therefore recommended.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticePreventive Health ServicesGermanyHumansCommunity-based health promotionEvidence-based prevention and health promotionImplementation fidelityQuasi-experimental studySystem change

Identifiers

PMID40591223
PMCPMC12394388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.